The Lady Lawyer The Lady Lawyer Columns
Special
Education

5th Circuit Case Law

7th Circuit Decisions

ABA via Insurance

Accommodations

Advocates

Altering Records

Assistive Technology

Autism Supplement

Basic Definitions

Being An Advocate

BSEA

Bullying / Harassment

Case Law

Charter Schools

Child Abuse Reporting

Choosing Counsel

Civil Rights Fight

Client Intake Form

Complaints

Compulsory Attendance

COPAA

Documentation

Due Process: How it Works

Evaluations

Extended School Year

Expulsions / Suspensions

Federal Laws

FERPA

First Steps

Funnies/Quotable Quotes

Glossary of Terms

Graduation

Graduation Rates

Graduation Walk

Guardianships

Hearing Officers

History of Federal Statutes

Homeschooling

IEP Checkup

Independent Educational Evaluations

Indiana State Laws

Inspirational Quotes

Insurance

Interrogation of Juveniles

LD & 18-point discrepancy model

Legal Settlement

Legislative Terms

Limitations

Mediation

Medicaid Waivers

Mental Health

Mistakes

My Calling

Neuropsych vs. Psychoeducational

New Regulations

OCR Complaints

Open Records

Options

Overview for Attorneys

Popular vs. Effective

Record Keeping

Resolution Chart

Residential Issues

Resolution Sessions

Sample Letters

Section 504

School Accountability

Special Ed Primer

Social Security

Supreme Court Cases

TAKS M/Alt

Tax Issues

TEKS

Texas Case Law

Texas Hearing Decisions

Texas State Law

Top 10 List for Judges

Top 10 Tips for Parents

Web Resources

Wheelchairs

Other Resources

History of Federal Statutes Affecting Special Education

Congress adds Title VI to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, creating a Bureau of Education for the Handicapped (now called OSEP) and creating and funding what is now called the Comprehensive System of Personnel Development, by which school districts can acquire and disseminate promising educational practices to teach students with disabilities. Reed was legislative assistant to Senator Yarborough who chaired the education committee at that time


1973

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is enacted into statute, and affects any recipient of federal financial assistance such as your school district and your state education agency.


1974

The EHA (Education of the Handicapped Act -- grandparent of IDEA) is enacted to greatly expand Title VI.


1974

FERPA (The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) is enacted, allowing parents to have access to all personally identifiable information collected, maintained or used by your school district in regard to your child.


1975

The EHA is amended by the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) which is the parent of the IDEA).

Before 1975, children with disabilities were denied an education solely on the basis of their disabilities. Two court cases, PARC v. Pennsylvania (1972) and Mills v. D.C. Board of Education (1972), creatively used the precedent of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) to apply the equal protection argument to students with disabilities. PARC and Mills legitimatized Congressional action in 1975.

1977

Sec. 504 regulations are issued, to begin with 1977-78 school year, and includes a requirement for a self-evaluation of all policies and procedures of your school district and your state education agency so that discriminatory policies would be stopped. (Congress notes in 1990 hearings that school districts illegally ignored this requirement).


1977

Appendix A to Section 504, which explains the Sec. 504 regulations, is issued.


1977

The EAHCA regulations are issued to begin with the 1977-78 school year.


1981

The EAHCA Appendix C is issued with 60 Q&A's about the IEP process (this is considered part of the federal law by federal courts but has been largely ignored by most school districts).


1986

The EAHCA is amended with the addition of the Handicapped Children's Protection Act (in which Congress overturns a Supreme Court decision that said the EAHCA was "an exclusive remedy" and that parents could not also use Section 504 to protect their child). The amendment makes clear that students and parents have rights under the IDEA and Section 504 at the same time.


1990

The Americans with Disabilities Act is enacted. Congress finds that the failures of school districts over the past 15 years of special education laws requires them to add the protection of the ADA to parents and students with disabilities. The ADA also adopts the Section 504 regulations as part of the ADA statute, so now the 504 regulations have the full weight of a federal statute.


1990

The EAHCA is amended and is now called the IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), adding transition as a requirement.


1991

The "Joint Policy Memorandum" from the U.S. Department of Education is issued, at the specific request of Congress, to explain what must be made available to your child under Section 504 in a regular classroom (the memo is on our website).


1997

The IDEA is amended with hundreds of changes that affect programming starting with the 1998-99 school year.


1999

The new IDEA Regulations are issued with many changes.


1999

The IDEA old Appendix C has been mostly included in the amendments to the IDEA statute so a new Appendix (now called Appendix A) is issued with 40 new Q&A's about the IEP process. The IDEA App. A is not to be confused with the Sec. 504 App A which was issued in 1977.


2001

Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001No Child Left Behind Resources


2004

President Bush signed into law on Dec. 3, 2004, changes to Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEIA 2004). The changes became effective July 1, 2005.

Top of Page

Copyright © 2002 Dorene J. Philpot LawAll Rights Reserved.DisclaimerSitemapWeb Services by Narrow Gate Media